Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Large-scale genomic analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis

BMC Biology volume 19, Article number: 191 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the gravest threats to human health and food security worldwide. The use of antimicrobials in livestock production can lead to emergence of AMR, which can have direct effects on humans through spread of zoonotic disease. Pigs pose a particular risk as they are a source of zoonotic diseases and receive more antimicrobials than most other livestock. Here we use a large-scale genomic approach to characterise AMR in Streptococcus suis, a commensal found in most pigs, but which can also cause serious disease in both pigs and humans.

Results

We obtained replicated measures of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for 16 antibiotics, across a panel of 678 isolates, from the major pig-producing regions of the world. For several drugs, there was no natural separation into ‘resistant’ and ‘susceptible’, highlighting the need to treat MIC as a quantitative trait. We found differences in MICs between countries, consistent with their patterns of antimicrobial usage. AMR levels were high even for drugs not used to treat S. suis, with many multidrug-resistant isolates. Similar levels of resistance were found in pigs and humans from regions associated with zoonotic transmission. We next used whole genome sequences for each isolate to identify 43 candidate resistance determinants, 22 of which were novel in S. suis. The presence of these determinants explained most of the variation in MIC. But there were also interesting complications, including epistatic interactions, where known resistance alleles had no effect in some genetic backgrounds. Beta-lactam resistance involved many core genome variants of small effect, appearing in a characteristic order.

Conclusions

We present a large dataset allowing the analysis of the multiple contributing factors to AMR in S. suis. The high levels of AMR in S. suis that we observe are reflected by antibiotic usage patterns but our results confirm the potential for genomic data to aid in the fight against AMR.

Background

The ability of bacterial pathogens to evolve resistance to antimicrobials is one of the gravest threats to human health and food security worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to a given drug can be quantified via the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), i.e. the minimum concentration of the drug that is sufficient to inhibit growth of a bacterial culture. While, for practical use, bacterial isolates are often categorised as either susceptible or resistant, MIC is a continuously varying trait (measured discontinuously). In this study, we investigate how AMR genes, variants and ecology explain antibiotic phenotype in the bacterium Streptococcus suis, treating MIC phenotype as a quantitative trait.

S. suis primarily exists as a commensal in pigs, colonising the nasopharynx, gut and vagina, but it also causes systemic and respiratory disease, particularly in young pigs [1]. S. suis is also a serious zoonotic disease, being the leading cause of adult bacterial meningitis in Vietnam [2]. While some autogenous vaccines are used in pig production, they are serotype-specific and give inconsistent cross protection against heterogeneous S. suis [3]. Antimicrobials therefore remain the standard treatment for S. suis, and as such, S. suis is a leading driver of antimicrobial usage in pig farms [4].

As well as being a serious problem in itself, S. suis also has unique benefits as a model for studying AMR. By weight, more pork is consumed globally than any other meat [5, 6], and S. suis is found in most, if not all, pigs [7]. Furthermore, antibiotic consumption is higher in pigs (172 mg per population corrected unit) than any other livestock (e.g. cattle (45 mg) and chicken (148 mg)) [8]. As a result, most S. suis lineages will experience antibiotics. These include not only antibiotics administered directly against S. suis, whether as a therapeutic, prophylaxis or metaphylaxis, but also, and perhaps more commonly, in response to many other bacterial infections and in limited countries as growth promoters [9, 10].

The strong selection pressure caused by widespread use of antimicrobials in pig farming is expected to give rise to AMR in S. suis. Consistent with this, several phenotypic studies show high MICs for each of the major classes of antibiotics in one or more S. suis collections [11,12,13,14,15]. In addition, there have been demonstrations of individual resistance determinants affecting MIC in S. suis [16,17,18], and also some mining of S. suis genome collections for known resistance determinants [19,20,21]. However, to our knowledge, no study has combined complete genomic and phenotypic information in large numbers of isolates, collected from a diverse range of populations.

To this end, we obtained replicated measures of MIC for 16 antibiotics, each widely used in pigs, for six different S. suis collections, comprising 678 isolates. These collections were chosen to include the three main pig-producing regions of the globe—namely the Americas, South East Asia and Europe—and targeted both human and pig hosts, as well as a range of years, serotypes and clinical phenotypes [22,23,24]. We obtained whole genome sequences for each of our isolates, allowing us to compare phenotype and genotype on an unprecedented scale.

Results

Measurement of MIC for 16 antibiotics in S. suis

We scored 678 isolates of Streptococcus suis for replicated measures of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for 16 antibiotics (Additional file 1: Table S1). Four of these are beta-lactams (amoxicillin, cefquinome, ceftiofur and penicillin), which are typically used to treat S. suis infection in pigs. The other antibiotics are all widely used in the pig industry, but found in different drug classes. They comprise macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB: erythromycin, lincomycin, tilmicosin and tylosin), tetracyclines (doxycycline and tetracycline) and fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin), plus one each of an aminoglycoside (spectinomycin), a pleuromutilin (tiamulin), trimethoprim (TMP) and a phenicol (florfenicol). Results, shown in the left-hand plot of Fig. 1, reveal wide variation among our isolates in MIC for most of the antibiotics. For a few antibiotics, especially the MLSB and tetracyclines, the MIC values are clearly bimodal, suggesting a meaningful division between ‘resistant’ and ‘wild-type’ isolates. However, for most antibiotics, the distributions are either roughly lognormal (fluoroquinolones and phenicols) or positively skewed (spectinomycin, pleuromutilin, TMP and beta-lactams). It is striking that the distributions for the beta-lactams are not clearly dissimilar from any of the other antibiotic classes, despite their being the most common treatment against S. suis. Given these distributions, and the general lack of defined clinical breakpoints for these antibiotics in S. suis [25], we treated MIC as a quantitative trait in our subsequent analyses.

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Candidate AMR determinants explain most of the variation in MIC. Histograms of log transformed MIC measures for each of our 16 different antibiotics, across our panel of 678 S. suis isolates. Antibiotics are coloured by their class (Beta: beta-lactams; MLSB: macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B; Tetra: tetracyclines; Fluoro: fluoroquinolones; Amino: aminoglycoside; Pleuro: pleuromutilin; TMP: trimethoprim and Phen: phenicol). In the 16 square panels, the left-hand histograms (labelled 0) show the MIC values for isolates that carry no determinant for that antibiotic class, while the right-hand histograms (labelled 1+) show the MIC values for isolates carrying one or more such determinant. If all resistance determinants perfectly explain MIC, then we expect to see histogram distributions on the bottom left (low MIC, no determinant) and the top right (high MIC, presence of candidate determinant(s)). For the first antimicrobial in each class, we show the number of candidate AMR determinants in square brackets, along with the number of isolates where candidate determinants are absent or present. r2 values show the proportion of the variance explained in a standard ANOVA by the presence of one or more candidate determinant

Full size image

Ecological and genomic predictors of MIC

Our S. suis isolates were collected at different times, and from different countries, hosts and body sites, including sites associated with respiratory and systemic disease. Isolates were also genetically heterogeneous, and differed in their serotype; including serotypes with a known disease association (see ‘Methods’ and Additional file 1: Table S1). We first used linear models, to ask whether MIC levels varied systematically with these ecological and genomic factors.

S. suis is highly recombining, such that no single genealogy describes its diversity [22]. As such, to characterise genomic diversity in our sample, we identified 30 BAPs clusters of similar strains (see ‘Methods’). Figure S1 shows a core genome phylogeny with these clusters highlighted (Additional file 2: Figure S1) [26,27,28]. The resulting clusters were a highly significant predictor of MIC (p < 10−15; Table 1 (A)) showing that genomically similar isolates tend to have similar MIC values. To account for this genetic structure, ‘cluster’ was included as a random effect in subsequent analyses.

Table 1 Ecological and genomic predictors of MIC
Full size table

A model including all potential predictors showed that country of isolation was also a highly significant predictor of MIC. In addition, there were weaker effects of year of collection (with a slight trend for increasing MIC over time); for serotype (with non-disease-associated serotypes tending to have higher MIC); and for host disease status (with non-clinical isolates having higher MIC) (Table 1 (B)).

Separate analyses for each antibiotic, showed that the effect of country was driven by consistently higher MIC in the samples from Canadian pigs. As shown in Fig. 2A (left-hand panel), this applied to 15/16 antibiotics, and also applied to various models (Table 1 (C)), and subsets of the data (Additional file 2: Figure S2). For example, the effect is seen consistently in systemic pathogens, respiratory pathogens and non-clinical isolates (Additional file 2: Figure S2). By contrast, the other predictors (year, serotype and clinical status) had effects that were less consistent or robust (Table 1 (D–F)). The difference in the MIC values between Canada and the UK is consistent with higher antimicrobial usage reported in Canada [29, 30].

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Differences in MICs between subsets of the data. Each row compares two subsets of the isolates: A the 423 isolates from UK pigs, and the 205 isolates from Canadian pigs. B the 50 isolates from Vietnam (all of which are from the genetic cluster ‘BAPS4’: Additional file 2, Figure S1), and the 112 BAPS4 isolates from the UK and Canada. C the 22 Vietnamese isolates from pigs, and the 28 Vietnamese isolates from people. Left-hand panels compare the mean log MICs for each antibiotic. Consistent deviations from the dotted 1:1 line suggest consistently higher or lower MICs in that subset of the data (so the rightward shift in panel A shows that MICs are consistently higher in Canada). Right-hand panels show the proportion of isolates that carry each of the 43 candidate AMR determinants. Each point or bar is coloured according to its drug class, according to the colour scheme in Fig. 1

Full size image

Predictions for Vietnam are more difficult, as there is a lack of official records of antibiotic usage, although it is likely that usage is both higher than in the EU and focussed on different drugs [31]. However, as shown in Fig. 2B (left-hand panel), we saw no such signal in the MIC data, even when we restricted the comparison to the genetic cluster BAPS4 that includes all of our Vietnamese sample (see ‘Methods’). The clearest pattern is for lower MIC for the MLSB class in the Vietnamese isolates (pink points in Fig. 2B left-hand panel). As shown in Fig. 2C (left-hand panel), we also found no robust differences between Vietnamese isolates sampled from humans and pigs. This is consistent with pigs being a reservoir for this zoonotic disease, and the lack of evidence of genomic adaptation to human hosts [22].

Identification of candidate AMR determinants within S. suis genomes

Using a candidate locus approach, we next identified known and putative determinants of AMR that were present in our sampled genomes. We considered both the presence/absence of whole genes, and sequence variants within genes. In total, we detected 43 determinants: 10 completely novel variants of known resistance genes, 12 known resistance genes detected in S. suis for the first time, and 21 previously reported in S. suis (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Table S1). Our candidates come from three sources: the antimicrobial resistance database CARD [40], previously published S. suis variants not present in the CARD database [36, 38, 39] and novel variants detected using a subset of our data (see ‘Methods’).

Table 2 AMR determinants of Streptococcus suis
Full size table

Of the 10 novel determinants, six are variants in genes previously associated with resistance in other bacteria (including a promoter variant). In particular, we discovered four novel haplotypes within the loop region of the central transpeptidase domains of the pbp2B and pbp2X genes and within the signal peptide region of the mraY gene (encoding the enzyme, acetylmuramoyl-pentapeptide-transferase, essential to cell wall biosynthesis) that were associated with variation in beta-lactam MIC (Table 2). In particular, we noted a PBP2X mutation at the conserved location T551, similar to that found in S. pneumoniae (T550), group B streptococci (T555) and S. pyogenes (T553) PBP2X proteins [41] indicative of a shared overall mechanism mediating beta-lactam resistance across the genus. Polymorphisms in mraY have also been identified in a genome-wide association study of beta-lactam resistance in S. pneumoniae [42]. In addition to these four beta-lactam haplotypes, two variants – a variant of the chromosomal dihydrofolate reductase gene dhfr and its promoter – were associated with reduced susceptibility against trimethoprim (Table 2). Furthermore, all of these six variants were independently associated with changes in MIC in at least seven different genetic clusters (Additional file 2: Table S2) implying that the association between these variants and MIC is either directly causal or compensatory to the causal variant [43].

The remaining four novel variants were whole genes with homologies to known resistance genes: three located on mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and one chromosomal (Table 2). Three novel aminoglycoside resistance genes, carried by isolates with high spectinomycin MIC, were identified based on aminoglycoside resistance determinant protein homologies. Although previously undescribed, we found homologues in other bacteria using a blastn search of the non-redundant database in GenBank (Table 2). We also characterised a chromosomally-encoded vgaC homologue (37% protein homology to vgaC), encoding an ABC-F ATP-binding cassette ribosomal protection protein, that we designate vgaF. This gene has arisen in 13 different BAPS clusters, each time associated with reduced susceptibility to tiamulin (Additional file 2: Table S2).

The 12 previously known AMR genes detected in S. suis for the first time are mobile genetic element (MGE)-linked genes that confer resistance to aminoglycosides (2/12), MLSB (2/12), tetracyclines (5/12), TMP (2/12) and phenicol (1/12). Based on the CARD and NCBI databases, these genes are associated with other gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Table 2).

Overall, most of our candidate determinants (28/43) were found in fewer than 5% of the isolates, but ermB (which confers resistance to the MLSB class) and tetO (which confers resistance to tetracyclines) were present in a majority of the isolates (Table 2). Only about a quarter of isolates carry a candidate determinant for the beta-lactams highlighting the continuing susceptibility to these first line treatment drugs in S. suis.

Nevertheless, as shown in Fig. 3, many isolates carried multiple determinants, and multidrug resistance was widespread. Around 40% of isolates carried resistance determinants to three or more classes of drug (275/678), and over 10% carried resistance determinants to five classes (81/678); this is more than carried no determinants at all (59/678).

Fig. 3.
figure 3

High levels of multidrug resistance in S. suis. The upper panel shows the number of our 678 isolates that carry a given number of candidate AMR determinants. The low panel shows the number of isolates that carry one or more AMR determinant for a given number of drug classes. Results show that more isolates carry determinants against 5 drug classes than carry no determinant at all.

Full size image

Candidate AMR determinants explain most of the variation in MIC

We next investigated how well our candidate variants explain the variation we observe in MIC (see Additional file 2: Figures S3-S9 for detailed plots). The right-hand panel of Fig. 1 compares the distribution of MIC values for isolates carrying one or more of the candidate AMR determinants for that antibiotic class (denoted ‘1+’), to the MIC of the remaining isolates, which carry no such determinant (denoted ‘0’).

The proportion of the variation in MIC explained by our variants varied between antibiotics. Explanatory power was strongest (r2 > 0.75) for antibiotics where the distributions of MIC were most clearly bimodal (MLSB and tetracyclines). By contrast, we found no association between our variants and MIC for the fluoroquinolones and phenicol, where the distribution of MIC values was roughly lognormal, consistent with our isolates representing a ‘wild-type’ population. For the remaining antibiotics, our determinants had intermediate explanatory power (Fig. 1), but there were very few isolates with high MIC that did not carry a candidate determinant. This suggests that we have detected most of the causal variants in our dataset, removing the need to perform additional genome-wide associations.

We next asked whether the variable presence of our candidate determinants in different ecological settings would explain the significant ecological predictors of MIC in our linear models (Table 1). Consistent with this hypothesis, the typical MIC level in each genetic cluster was highly correlated with the frequency of determinants in that cluster (Additional file 2: Figure S10).

Differences between countries were explained in the same way. The higher MIC in Canada than the UK was due to consistently higher frequencies of the same determinants (Fig. 2A right-hand panel)—with the exception of trimethoprim (see below). By contrast, tetracycline resistance throughout the BAPS4 cluster, though at similar levels in all three countries, was conferred by different determinants in Vietnam (Fig. 2B).

Ineffective variants and epistasis

While our data contained few isolates with high MIC that did not carry a candidate determinant, there were many isolates with low MIC despite carrying a determinant (Fig. 1).

In some cases, this was due to previously identified candidate genes that had no appreciable effect on MIC in our data. For example, spectinomycin MIC was unchanged by some determinants identified from the CARD database (e.g. ant(6’)-Ib in Additional file 2: Figure S7). If we allow for the presence of these non-functional genes, the r2 value for spectinomycin increases from 0.37 (Fig. 1) to 0.69 (Additional file 2: Figure S11a).

In other cases, as is well known, variants act against only some of the antibiotics in a class. In MLSB, for example, modification of the ribosomal target confers cross resistance to macrolides and lincosamides, while mechanisms such as efflux and enzymatic inactivation do not [44]; so msrD acts against erythromycin, but not against lincomycin, while linB inactivates lincomycin, but not erythromycin (Additional file 2: Figure S4). Again, taking this into account further increases predictive power (Additional file 2: Figure S11a).

As well as these simple cases, there were some clear examples of genetic interactions. For trimethoprim, two candidate variants—in the protein DHFR102 and its promoter (Table 2)—were found at higher frequency in the UK than Canada (Fig. 2A, right-hand-panel), but in Canada, the two variants were more often found together, leading to higher MIC overall (Fig. 2A; Additional file 2: Figure S9).

Finally, we observed complex patterns for the second most common determinant in our dataset, ermB. For the 334 isolates that carried only ermB (and no other candidate determinant to MLSB class drugs), MIC values were clearly bimodal, with many carriers having very low MIC (Additional file 2: Figures S4 and S12). Further analysis revealed a small number of isolates with frameshift or premature stop codons (4/326 isolates with complete sequences in our assemblies). While the remaining isolates with low MIC carried rare amino acid variants at one of four positions (T75X, N100S, R118H and V226I)—the last three of which differentiate the ermB sequences found in Streptococcus pneumoniae from Clostridium perfringens [45]. Nevertheless, no particular sequence was always associated with low MIC, suggesting some unidentified source of epistasis (see ‘Methods’ and Additional file 2: Figure S12 for full details).

Resistance to beta-lactams

While beta-lactams are the major treatment class for S. suis, it is notable that the explanatory power of our variants seems to be weaker for this drug class than for, e.g. tetracyclines or MLSB.

In Streptococci, a typical route to beta-lactam resistance involves variants in the pbp genes, and it is well established that the joint action of many pbp variants is necessary to explain substantial changes in MIC [46, 47]. Single-point mutations in pbp2x, for example, cause very modest elevations in S. pneumoniae [46], group B Streptococci [48], Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis [49] and Streptococcus pyogenes [41].

Like S. pneumoniae, S. suis has three key pbp genes, pbp1A, pbp2b and pbp2x, and shares a similarly broad MIC distribution (although with typically lower MIC values) [47, 50, 51]. Our data also show that mutations in pbp2x alone have small effects (Additional file 2: Figure S3), while genotypes carrying four or more variants have the highest mean MIC (Additional file 2: Figure S3). Our explanatory power increases greatly when we predict beta-lactam MIC from the total number of candidate variants carried (Additional file 2: Figure S11b). Although official breakpoints are lacking for many beta-lactam antibiotics in S. suis, for penicillin, only the isolates with the most variants reach clinical significance (i.e. penicillin resistance ≥ 1 or log(0) MIC).

In S. pneumoniae, it has also been noted that mutations conferring resistance to beta-lactams occur in a set order, with amino acid changes in PBP2B and PBP2X often acting as the first step [46, 52, 53]. Figure 4 shows that our data also show this characteristic ‘nested’ pattern (see also Additional file 2: Figure S13 [28];), with PBP2X mutations largely occurring in backgrounds containing PBP2B mutations and MraY mutations occurring in backgrounds containing both PBP2B and PBP2X mutations.

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Beta-lactam resistance determinants have additive effects and appear in a consistent order. The left-hand panel shows that the candidate determinants against the beta-lactam drug class often appear in a consistent order. For example, the mutation at site 551 of PBP2X tends to appear in backgrounds that already carry mutations in PBP2B. The plot was generated according to the method and plotting convention of [28], where each row represents an isolate, and those isolates that fit the nested pattern are shown in pink. Results show that 93.5% (634/678) of our isolates fit the nested pattern. The right-hand plots show the log MIC values for these 634 isolates, comparing isolates carrying different numbers of candidate determinants.

Full size image

It is notable that mutations in MraY—which are generally last to occur, and never occur alone—might have a compensatory effect. Altered PBPs, while conferring resistance, might be less active transpeptidases than their wild-type counterparts [54]. For example, the amidotransferase enzyme encoded by murT enables cross-linking of cell wall peptidoglycans by preparing lipid II used by pneumococcal PBPs [55, 56]. Mutations in MraY might therefore compensate for reduced enzymatic activity of altered PBPs.

Studies have shown that cefotaxime, a third-generation cephalosporin like ceftiofur, selectively inactivates PBP2X but not PBP2B [57]. Our results echo this pattern because our PBP2B haplotype has a smaller change on mean MIC of ceftiofur than penicillin (Additional file 2: Figure S3), and the explanatory effects of our PBP haplotypes differ between the drugs (Fig. 1). Previous variants in PBP2X thought to confer cefuroxime resistance [38] and, while validated by our data, were only found at very low frequency in our collection (Table 2).

Discussion

We have examined antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis to 16 antibiotics that are commonly used in pigs. Replicated measures of MIC suggest that, even when some isolates have very high MIC, there is often no natural separation into ‘resistant’ and ‘susceptible’ (Fig. 1). This highlights both the need for clinical breakpoints in S. suis, and the need to evaluate AMR with quantitative measurements of MIC. This is particularly important for beta-lactam resistance, given its multi-allelic nature (Fig. 4, Additional file 2: Figure S3), and the phenomenon of ‘MIC creep’ that may eventually lead to treatment failures (e.g. vancomycin resistance in MRSA in some regions [58, 59]).

We have also shown that AMR levels differ systematically between countries. For example, compared to the UK, Canada has consistently higher MICs, and frequencies of the same candidate AMR determinants (Fig. 2, Additional file 2: Figure S1). Differences in antimicrobial usage are the most plausible explanation for this trend, because usage is much higher in Canada than in the UK [29, 30]. In particular, the ban on antibiotics used as growth promoters came into effect in Canada only in 2018 versus 2006 in the UK. However, our results are correlational and other factors could be explanatory, e.g. different microbiome compositions in pigs from different areas.

Next, we have identified 43 candidate resistance determinants and shown that they explain the majority of the observed variation in MIC for 11/16 antibiotics, and a substantial fraction of the variation for a further 2/16 (Fig. 1).

While many of these variants were previously described, and most were found at low frequency (Table 2; Fig. 2), we detected three novel candidates that are common and associated with clinically relevant changes in MIC: vgaF, DHFR102 and the dhfr promoter. A new mechanism for tiamulin resistance, such as the vgaF, could have implications for treatment success because tiamulin is a common drug for treating infections in livestock, including pigs [60]. High-level trimethoprim resistance was associated with mutations in the promoter regions of the dhfr gene. This is in contrast to the folA (I100L), folP 1-2 codon insertion combination conferring high-level resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMS) in S. pneumoniae [61]. While our MICs were for trimethoprim, our observations suggest the evolution of divergent mechanisms of resistance against TMS between these species. If these resistance mechanisms are functionally verified, they should be included in routine AMR gene testing for S. suis.

While our candidate variants were explanatory, we also found several complexities in the genotype-phenotype map. These include epistatic interactions, where the effects of some candidate genes vary with their S. suis genetic background. Phenotypic reversion (i.e. mutations in transcriptional regulators or elsewhere in the genome, counteracting a resistance determinant) can be common if resistance has a fitness cost [62]. In addition, resistance genes have been shown to be transcriptionally silenced [63]. These processes could explain why we see many isolates carrying candidate determinants but with low MIC (Fig. 1). This same pattern is also common in other bacteria and up to 10% of S. aureus isolates [64,65,66,67,68]. These complexities have consequences for diagnostic investigation of AMR of S. suis using whole genome sequences. While the predictive power is quite high for many antibiotics, we should expect many type I errors (false positives). These results also caution against using the presence of AMR determinants as a measure of resistance more generally.

While susceptibility to penicillin in clinical cases of S. suis remains high, we see substantial variation in beta-lactam MIC (Fig. 1A). Consistent with studies in other Streptococci, our results show incremental and ordered changes in amino acids, first within PBP2A and then PBP2X that lead to clinically relevant elevations in MICs. Accurate predictions of genotype-phenotype have already been developed in S. pneumoniae [47, 61, 69,70,71], group B Streptococci [72] and S. pyogenes [41]. With no effective treatment for S. suis other than antibiotics, developing similar models and monitoring of these variants in S. suis populations should be a priority.

Two final aspects of our results highlight the fact that while individual battles against AMR are effective, AMR is not always a problem that can be tackled one disease at a time.

First, we have found high levels of resistance in S. suis even to antibiotics that are not typically used to treat this infection, including high rates of multidrug resistance (Fig. 3). This trend could be partly due to the co-occurrence of resistance genes on MGEs. However, determinants for beta-lactams (found in 190/678 isolates)—which are the primary treatment—were less common than those for tetracyclines (574/678), MLSB (395/678), trimethoprim (246/678) and tiamulin (193/678). This pattern probably reflects a ‘bystander selection effect’, common in opportunistic pathogens that are part of the healthy microbiota and frequently exposed to antibiotics used as therapeutics or growth promoters (although antimicrobial growth promoters are now banned in the UK, Vietnam and Canada). However, we note that beta-lactams are prescribed at similar (if not higher frequencies) than many other drug classes in pigs making the pattern of fewer beta-lactam determinants particularly surprising.

Second, many of the rarer AMR genes in our sample were not previously known in S. suis, but are common in other bacteria, both gram negative and gram positive (Table 2). Together with the presence of non-typical Streptococcal ermB in some isolates, this raises the possibility of S. suis acting as a reservoir for AMR determinants in other bacteria. Indeed S. suis shares conserved chromosomal insertion sites with many human pathogens, such as S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae [19]. Given that S. suis causes human clinical disease, a direct exchange of AMR genes between S. suis and other human pathogens is plausible. Our results lend further support to a one health approach to tackling AMR.

Conclusions

We present a comprehensive dataset comprising genomes, MIC and metadata allowing the first large-scale analysis of the multiple contributing factors to AMR in S. suis. Overall, the high levels of AMR that we observe are reflected by antibiotic usage patterns in pigs. First, S. suis is resistant to many classes of antibiotics that are not typically used to treat S. suis infection. Second, MIC and AMR determinant prevalence is significantly higher in Canada than the UK where antibiotic usage is lower. This indicates that the ongoing effort to reduce antimicrobial use in livestock worldwide may be effective for reducing AMR in S. suis. Our results also highlight some interesting complications in the genotype to phenotype map in S. suis but overall, the explanatory power we observe confirms the potential for genomic data to aid in the fight against AMR.

Methods

Streptococcus suis isolates

We assembled a collection of 678 S. suis isolates, including isolates from the UK (n = 423), Canada (n = 205) and Vietnam (n = 50) (Additional file 1: Table S1).

In the UK, isolates came from three different collections. The first collection in 2009–2011 sampled non-clinical and clinical isolates from pigs across England and Wales (described in Weinert et al. [22]). The second collection in 2013–2014 sampled non-clinical isolates from five farms (described in Zou et al. [24]). The third collection during 2013–2014 targeted clinical isolates from pigs across England and Wales (described in Wileman et al. [23]). In pigs that showed clinical symptoms consistent with S. suis infections (e.g. meningitis, septicaemia and arthritis), the site of isolation was classified as ‘systemic’ if recovered from systemic sites. The site of recovery was classified as ‘respiratory’ if derived from lungs with gross lesions of pneumonia. S. suis isolates from the tonsils or tracheo-bronchus of healthy pigs or dead pigs without any typical signs of S. suis infections were defined as ‘non-clinical’. Isolates that could not confidently be assigned to these categories (e.g. a tonsil isolate from a pig with systemic signs) were classified as unknown. Altogether, the UK isolates were classified by clinical status as ‘systemic’ (n = 94), ‘respiratory’ (n = 50), ‘non-clinical’ (n = 197) or ‘unknown’ (n = 82), respectively.

The Canadian pig S. suis isolates from 1983 to 2016 were collected to target similar numbers of clinical and non-clinical isolates and were also classified by clinical status as ‘systemic’ (n = 81), ‘respiratory’ (n = 30), ‘non-clinical’ (n = 55) or ‘unknown’ (n = 39).

The Vietnamese isolates were collected to sample related populations from human and pig (described in Weinert et al. [22]). These comprised ‘systemic’ isolates (n = 28) from human clinical cases of meningitis from provinces in southern and central Vietnam, and ‘systemic’ (n = 4) or ‘non-clinical’ isolates (n = 18) from pigs, collected between 2000 and 2010. These isolates were exclusively serotype 2 or serotype 14 and belong to one genetic population (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for a range of antibiotics were determined by the micro-broth dilution method, which was performed and the results interpreted in accordance with CLSI Approved Standards, M100-S25 (2015), Vet01S 3rd Edition (2015) and de Jong et al. [11, 73]. MIC measurements for some of our isolates were previously published [11]. For the remaining MIC measurements, the MICs were determined for sixteen different antimicrobial compounds, representing nine antimicrobial classes at LGC, Fordham, UK (formerly Quotient Bioresearch, Fordham, UK), for the UK and the Canadian isolates. MIC testing of antibiotics for the Vietnamese isolates was performed at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, in collaboration with the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.

Whole genome sequencing, assembly and inference of population structure

Genome DNA extractions and whole genome sequencing of newly sequenced S. suis in this study were as previously described by Weinert et al. [22]. Briefly, single colonies of strains were grown up in broth culture, DNA was extracted using DNeasy kits (Qiagen), Illumina library preparations were performed as described by Quail et al. [74] and the whole genomes sequenced on the HiSeq2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at the Welcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK. Sequencing generated 125 bp paired end reads, which were assessed for quality using Sickle [75] after the removal of adapter sequences.

Sequencing reads that passed the quality threshold were put forward for de novo assembly generation using Spades v.3.10.1 [76] utilising a variety of parameters conditions. Our 678 isolates were combined with 401 additional genomes given in Additional file 3: Table S3 [27] to increase robustness of S. suis population structure estimation, although these isolates were unavailable for MIC testing. Draft genomes were annotated using Prokka v1.12-beta (v2.8.2) [77], and bacterial species assignment was performed by a combination of MLST assignment and FastQ Screen v.0.11.1 using a custom database [78]. We mapped the Illumina reads back to the de novo assembly to investigate polymorphic reads in the samples (indicative of mixed cultures) using BWA v.0.7.16a [79].

Genomes that exhibited poor sequencing quality (i.e. poor assembly as indicated by a large number of contigs (> 2.5% of the genome assembly in contigs less than 1 kb) an N50 value of less than 10 kb or a high number of polymorphic reads (> 2000 SNPs)) or that which were inconsistent with an S. suis species assignment were excluded from the analysis.

In order to group our S. suis isolates into different genetic clusters, we used the programme hierBAPs in R [80, 81]. First, we inferred core genes from our isolates using Roary (v2.8.2) [82], aligned them using MACSE [83] and stripped regions that could not be aligned unambiguously due to high divergence, indels or missing data. This conserved region of the core genome was used as input in hierBAPS and to produce a consensus neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree using the K80 model in the R package ape (Additional file 2: Figure S1) [81, 84].

Known AMR determinant detection

ARIBA [85] identifies AMR determinants (or any sequence of interest) directly from paired sequencing reads using a public or custom reference database and relies on mapping the reads to reference sequence clusters followed by the formation of local assemblies of the mapped reads. The tool is further able to confirm the intactness of resistance genes to identify known or novel SNPs within a gene of interest.

The AMR determinants in S. suis were identified using ARIBA v2.10.0 based on the public AMR database, CARD [40], which was further supplemented with a custom database. The custom database contained gene sequences not present within the CARD database at the time of testing. These were previously published S. suis AMR genes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes known to confer antibiotic resistance and AMR genes found in other bacteria. In addition, we investigated whether there were additional novel resistance variants in known resistance genes (described below). The sequence identity threshold against a reference was set at 90%. Only paired end sequence reads that passed the quality control thresholds were used as input for ARIBA. To identify genes falling under the 90% identity threshold, we also performed blast searches of the draft assemblies against the non-redundant NCBI protein or nucleotide databases to identify variants or chimeric alleles of known resistance determinants that might not be present in the CARD database. Examples of allelic variants identified this way include tet, aad, ant and cat (Table 2).

Novel AMR candidate determinant detection

We identified novel resistance determinants by a range of methods. Candidate determinants that might encode novel resistance mechanisms were identified by scanning literature describing experimental studies and others found by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in related bacterial species, for example, variants of pbps, mraY, dhfr and folA [46, 86,87,88] along with their promoter regions. To avoid over-fitting our generalised linear models, gene or promoters of interest in a ‘training’ subset of the collection (n = 205) were then extracted, aligned and ranked from the highest to lowest MIC values, using MUSCLE [89] in SEAVIEW [90]. Manual sequence analysis was then performed to identify either amino acid or nucleotide variations that associated with high MIC.

Kinetic and structural studies have previously established that beta-lactam resistance is conferred by substitutions within PBPs in Streptococcus pneumoniae [46, 91] and other streptococci [49, 92, 93]. While mutations are present throughout the entire PBPs, we noted statistically significant mutations (Additional file 2: Table S2) in altered PBP2B and PBP2X proteins in strains exhibiting high penicillin (≥ 1 mg/L) and ceftiofur MICs (≥ 2 mg/L), respectively. In PBP2B, the residue variations were present in loop regions, K479T/A, D512E/Q/K/A, K513E/D and T515S, within the S. suis transpeptidase domain (residues 351-681). In PBP2X, the mutations were located at positions M437L, S445T, T467S, Y525F and T551S, also in loop regions within its catalytic domain (residues 265–619). No statistically significant variations were found within PBP1A, although the variant P405T was shared by some of the BAP clusters. As multiple amino acid variants were identified within PBP2X and PBP2B, many of which were in the same genomic region (Table 2), we grouped the variants in to haplotypes. We did this by scoring haplotype presence if the isolate had all of the amino acid variants associated with high MIC in a given gene.

In addition to allelic differences in PBP2B and PBP2X, we also detected mutations in mraY. Found immediately upstream of pbp2X, mraY encodes an acetylmuramoyl-pentapeptide-transferase enzyme which is essential to lipid cycle reactions in the peptidoglycan cell wall biosynthesis pathway. Residue substitutions were present at A4S/T, M6I/L and G8S within the signal peptide regions of the protein. These substitutions were in strong linkage disequilibrium, such that they almost always occurred in pairs. In particular, both A4S/T and G8S occurred only in isolates also carrying M6I/L, while M6I/L appeared alone in only a single isolate. As such, we scored each isolate as carrying the mraY determinant only if it carried two of these three amino acid substitutions (either A4S/T and M6I/L, or G8S and M6I/L; Table 2). This set of isolates differed significantly in their MICs in both penicillin and ceftiofur across multiple BAP groups (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Not all isolates with high tiamulin MICs possessed a lsaE gene, suggesting an additional mechanism in S. suis conferring resistance to pleuromutilins. Using the CARD RGI (resistance gene identifier) protein homology models, a vgaC homologue was identified as a candidate gene associated with variation in tiamulin MIC. The gene, designated as vgaF in this work, encodes an ABC-F ATP-binding cassette ribosomal protection protein and shares 37.14% homology to the reference. Located within the chromosome, vgaF is found intact (~ 1386 bp) in statistically significant numbers in isolates with MIC ≥ 8 mg/L (Additional file 2: Table S2) but is truncated (< 750 bp) in others. Plasmid borne vga homologues including vgaC are frequently detected in staphylococci and have been shown to confer cross resistance to pleuromutilins, lincosamides and streptogramin A antibiotics. A chromosome based vgaA gene variant, encoding an ATP-binding cassette protein conferring resistance to streptogramin A and related antibiotics in S. aureus, has also been described [94].

An amino acid substitution (I102-L) was detected in the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene, dhfr (counterpart of folA in S. pneumoniae), in the majority of isolates with trimethoprim MICs of 0.12 mg/L or greater. Similar substitutions of isoleucine to leucine at position 100 in S. pneumoniae [87, 95] and Streptococcus pyogenes [96] is known to cause resistance to TMP. Additionally, we also identified polymorphisms within the promoter region (0–30 bp upstream) of the dhfr gene, an A5G substitution and insertions, in isolates exhibiting MICs ≥ 1 mg/L.

Mutations such as 1–2 codon insertions within folP, another core metabolic gene that is documented to confer resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in S. pneumoniae, were also examined. While insertions and or deletions were absent, amino acid residue variations were observed at position 198 (A198G) either alone (9/678) or in combination with dhfr I102L (26/678 isolates) in isolates exhibiting a wide range of trimethoprim MICs; 0.03 mg/L–32 mg/mL. However, this data was not statistically significant in the Binomial sign tests and hence was excluded from further analysis.

All of these variants might be causal, compensatory or linked to high MIC because of population structure. We therefore examined our variants and showed that susceptible and resistance alleles were found repeatedly in different BAP clusters, which were significant using binomial sign tests when defining a cut-off (Additional file 2: Table S2).

The pbp, mraY and vgaF genes were unable to be included into the custom database in ARIBA because of the sequence divergence. Therefore, we manually aligned the genes in all 678 isolates using MUSCLE [89] in SEAVIEW [90].

Similarly, analysis for known variants in gyrA and parC were also performed by manually aligning the genes. The tet(O/W/32/O) gene was scored by using blastn because ARIBA was unable to differentiate mosaic sequence patterns

Serotype inference from whole genomes

Serotypes were determined in silico using the Athey et al. [97] serotype database, which we implemented in ARIBA. Failed ARIBA runs and sequence non-matches were designated as not available (NA).

Statistical analyses

All general linear models were fit in R v. 3.3 [98] using the built-in function lm for models with solely fixed effects, or via Reduced Maximum Likelihood, using the function lme from the package nlme v. 3.1-141 [99], when BAPs cluster was included as a random effect. The response MIC values were log transformed. Our data for host and country is confounded because all of our human samples came from Vietnam (human S. suis has a higher prevalence in South East Asia [37]). Therefore, we coded ‘Country’ as separate populations—Canada, UK, Vietnam-pig and Vietnam-human. We classified ‘serotypes’ into either disease-associated or non-disease associated according to Wileman et al. [23].

Availability of data and materials

Whole genome sequence assemblies are available from NCBI under Project ID PRJNA628943 [100]. The gene cat from isolate FX419 has accession MT367165. The gene aadE1 from isolate CF2D3-1A has accession MT383663. The gene aadE2 from isolate BH3D7-4E has accession MT383664. The gene ant1 from isolate CF2D3-1C has accession MT383665. The gene tetM from isolate 1129711 has accession MT383666. The gene tetM from isolate LSS85 has accession MT383667. The gene tetM from isolate SS981 has accession MT383668. The gene tetO from isolate D16-010262 has accession MT383669. The gene vgaF from isolate 1230091 has accession MT431628.

References

  1. de Moor CE. Septicaemic infections in pigs, caused by haemolytic streptococci of new Lancefield groups designated R, S and T. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1963;29(1):272–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/BF02046069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wertheim HFL, Nguyen HN, Taylor W, Lien TTM, Ngo HT, Nguyen TQ, et al. Streptococcus suis, an important cause of adult bacterial meningitis in Northern Vietnam. PloS one. 2009;4(6):e5973. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0005973.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Baums CG, Kock C, Beineke A, Bennecke K, Goethe R, Schröder C, et al. Streptococcus suis bacterin and subunit vaccine immunogenicities and protective efficacies against serotypes 2 and 9. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16(2):200–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/CVI.00371-08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Rennings L, von Münchhausen C, Ottilie H, Hartmann M, Merle R, Honscha W, et al. Cross-sectional study on antibiotic usage in pigs in Germany. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0119114. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0119114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McGlone JJ. The future of pork production in the world: towards sustainable, welfare-positive systems. Animals. 2013;3(2):401–15. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani3020401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinfeld H, Gerber PJ, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options 2006.

  7. Goyette-Desjardins G, Auger J-P, Xu J, Segura M, Gottschalk M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent—an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2014;3(1):1–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/emi.2014.45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(18):5649–54. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1073/pnas.1503141112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Spellberg B, Bartlett JG, Gilbert DN. The future of antibiotics and resistance. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(4):299–302. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMp1215093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lekagul A, Tangcharoensathien V, Yeung S. Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: a systematic review. Vet Anim Sci. 2019;7:100058. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez-Garcia J, Wang J, Restif O, Holmes MA, Mather AE, Weinert LA, et al. Patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus suis isolates from pigs with or without streptococcal disease in England between 2009 and 2014. Vet Microbiol. 2017;207:117–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yongkiettrakul S, Maneerat K, Arechanajan B, Malila Y, Srimanote P, Gottschalk M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs, asymptomatic pigs, and human patients in Thailand. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12917-018-1732-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Marie J, Morvan H, Berthelot-Hérault F, Sanders P, Kempf I, Gautier-Bouchardon AV, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from swine in France and from humans in different countries between 1996 and 2000. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(2):201–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dkf099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Šeol B, Kelnerić Ž, Hajsig D, Madić J, Naglić T. Susceptibility to antimicrobial agents of Streptococcus suis capsular type 2 strains isolated from pigs. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1996;283(3):328–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0934-8840(96)80067-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Turgeon PL, Higgins R, Gottschalk M, Beaudoin M. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolates. Br Vet J. 1994;150(3):263–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0007-1935(05)80006-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurung M, Tamang MD, Moon DC, Kim S-R, Jeong J-H, Jang G-C, et al. Molecular basis of resistance to selected antimicrobial agents in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(7):2332–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/JCM.00123-15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yao J, Shang K, Huang J, Ran W, Kashif J, Wang L. Overexpression of an ABC transporter and mutations of GyrA, GyrB, and ParC in contributing to high-level ciprofloxacin resistance in Streptococcus suis type 2. Biosci Trends. 2014;8(2):84–92. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5582/bst.8.84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoa NT, Chieu TT, Nghia HD, Mai NT, Anh PH, Wolbers M, et al. The antimicrobial resistance patterns and associated determinants in Streptococcus suis isolated from humans in southern Vietnam, 1997-2008. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11(1):6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1471-2334-11-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang J, Ma J, Shang K, Hu X, Liang Y, Li D, et al. Evolution and diversity of the antimicrobial resistance associated mobilome in Streptococcus suis: a probable mobile genetic elements reservoir for other streptococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6(118).  https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC5053989/

  20. Hu P, Yang M, Zhang A, Wu J, Chen B, Hua Y, et al. Comparative genomics study of multi-drug-resistance mechanisms in the antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus suis R61 strain. PloS one. 2011;6(9):e24988. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0024988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Holden MT, Hauser H, Sanders M, Ngo TH, Cherevach I, Cronin A, et al. Rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. PloS one. 2009;4(7):e6072. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0006072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinert LA, Chaudhuri RR, Wang J, Peters SE, Corander J, Jombart T, et al. Genomic signatures of human and animal disease in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):6740. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/ncomms7740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wileman TM, Weinert LA, Howell KJ, Wang J, Peters SE, Williamson SM, et al. Pathotyping the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis: novel genetic markers to differentiate invasive disease-associated isolates from non-disease-associated isolates from England and Wales. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(7):e01712–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zou G, Zhou J, Xiao R, Zhang L, Cheng Y, Jin H, et al. Effects of environmental and management-associated factors on prevalence and diversity of Streptococcus suis in clinically healthy pig herds in China and the United Kingdom. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(8):e02590–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. van Hout J, Heuvelink A, Gonggrijp M. Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis in the Netherlands, 2013–2015. Vet Microbiol. 2016;194:5–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.03.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W256–W9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkz239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Murray GGR, Charlesworth J, Miller EL, Casey MJ, Lloyd CT, Gottschalk M, et al. Genome reduction is associated with bacterial pathogenicity across different scales of temporal and ecological divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(4):1570–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/molbev/msaa323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehtinen S, Blanquart F, Lipsitch M, Fraser C, with the Maela Pneumococcal Collaboration. On the evolutionary ecology of multidrug resistance in bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(5):e1007763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunlop RH, McEwen SA, Meek AH, Black WD, Clarke RC, Friendship RM. Individual and group antimicrobial usage rates on 34 farrow-to-finish swine farms in Ontario, Canada. Prev Vet Med. 1998;34(4):247–64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0167-5877(97)00093-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Directorate VM. UK veterinary antibiotic resistance and sales surveillance report. 2018.

  31. Carrique-Mas JJ, Choisy M, Van Cuong N, Thwaites G, Baker S. An estimation of total antimicrobial usage in humans and animals in Vietnam. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13756-019-0671-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang K, Zhang Q, Song Y, Zhang Z, Zhang A, Xiao J, et al. Characterization of spectinomycin resistance in Streptococcus suis leads to two novel insights into drug resistance formation and dissemination mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(10):6390–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.01157-16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang B, Wada A, Ikebe T, Ohnishi M, Mita K, Endo M, et al. Characteristics of Streptococcus suis isolated from patients in Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2006;59(6):397–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bojarska A, Molska E, Janas K, Skoczynska A, Stefaniuk E, Hryniewicz W, et al. Streptococcus suis in invasive human infections in Poland: clonality and determinants of virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(6):917–25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10096-016-2616-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Athey TB, Auger JP, Teatero S, Dumesnil A, Takamatsu D, Wasserscheid J, et al. Complex population structure and virulence differences among serotype 2 Streptococcus suis strains belonging to sequence type 28. PloS one. 2015;10(9):e0137760. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0137760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Palmieri C, Magi G, Mingoia M, Bagnarelli P, Ripa S, Varaldo PE, et al. Characterization of a Streptococcus suis tet(O/W/32/O)-carrying element transferable to major streptococcal pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(9):4697–702. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.00629-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Palmieri C, Varaldo PE, Facinelli B. Streptococcus suis, an emerging drug-resistant animal and human pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ge Y, Wu J, Xia Y, Yang M, Xiao J, Yu J. Molecular dynamics simulation of the complex PBP-2x with drug cefuroxime to explore the drug resistance mechanism of Streptococcus suis R61. PloS one. 2012;7(4):e35941. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0035941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Escudero JA, San Millan A, Catalan A, de la Campa AG, Rivero E, Lopez G, et al. First characterization of fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus suis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(2):777–82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.00972-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D566–D73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkw1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vannice KS, Ricaldi J, Nanduri S, Fang FC, Lynch JB, Bryson-Cahn C, et al. Streptococcus pyogenes pbp2x Mutation Confers Reduced Susceptibility to β-Lactam Antibiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(1):201–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/cid/ciz1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chewapreecha C, Marttinen P, Croucher NJ, Salter SJ, Harris SR, Mather AE, et al. Comprehensive identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with beta-lactam resistance within pneumococcal mosaic genes. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(8):e1004547. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Albarracin Orio AG, Pinas GE, Cortes PR, Cian MB, Echenique J. Compensatory evolution of pbp mutations restores the fitness cost imposed by beta-lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(2):e1002000. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Leclercq R. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(4):482–92. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/324626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Farrow KA, Lyras D, Polekhina G, Koutsis K, Parker MW, Rood JI. Identification of essential residues in the Erm(B) rRNA methyltransferase of Clostridium perfringens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(5):1253–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.46.5.1253-1261.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Grebe T, Hakenbeck R. Penicillin-binding proteins 2b and 2x of Streptococcus pneumoniae are primary resistance determinants for different classes of beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40(4):829–34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.40.4.829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li Y, Metcalf BJ, Chochua S, Li Z, Gertz RE, Walker H, et al. Penicillin-binding protein transpeptidase signatures for tracking and predicting β-lactam resistance levels in Streptococcus pneumoniae. mBio. 2016;7(3):e00756–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Dahesh S, Hensler ME, Van Sorge NM, Gertz RE Jr, Schrag S, Nizet V, et al. Point mutation in the group B streptococcal pbp2x gene conferring decreased susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(8):2915–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.00461-08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fuursted K, Stegger M, Hoffmann S, Lambertsen L, Andersen PS, Deleuran M, et al. Description and characterization of a penicillin-resistant Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis clone isolated from blood in three epidemiologically linked patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(12):3376–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dkw320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Holmer I, Salomonsen CM, Jorsal SE, Astrup LB, Jensen VF, Høg BB, et al. Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):449. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12917-019-2162-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Liñares J, Ardanuy C, Pallares R, Fenoll A. Changes in antimicrobial resistance, serotypes and genotypes in Streptococcus pneumoniae over a 30-year period. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(5):402–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03182.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mouz N, Di Guilmi AM, Gordon E, Hakenbeck R, Dideberg O, Vernet T. Mutations in the active site of penicillin-binding protein PBP2x from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Role in the specificity for beta-lactam antibiotics. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(27):19175–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1074/jbc.274.27.19175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nagai K, Davies TA, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC. Effects of amino acid alterations in penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 1a, 2b, and 2x on PBP affinities of penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefditoren, cefuroxime, cefprozil, and cefaclor in 18 clinical isolates of penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(5):1273–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.46.5.1273-1280.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Calvez P, Breukink E, Roper DI, Dib M, Contreras-Martel C, Zapun A. Substitutions in PBP2b from beta-lactam-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae have different effects on enzymatic activity and drug reactivity. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(7):2854–65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1074/jbc.M116.764696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Figueiredo TA, Sobral RG, Ludovice AM, Almeida JM, Bui NK, Vollmer W, et al. Identification of genetic determinants and enzymes involved with the amidation of glutamic acid residues in the peptidoglycan of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(1):e1002508. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zapun A, Philippe J, Abrahams KA, Signor L, Roper DI, Breukink E, et al. In vitro reconstitution of peptidoglycan assembly from the Gram-positive pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8(12):2688–96. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1021/cb400575t.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kocaoglu O, Tsui HC, Winkler ME, Carlson EE. Profiling of beta-lactam selectivity for penicillin-binding proteins in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(6):3548–55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.05142-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Sakoulas G, Moellering RC Jr. Increasing antibiotic resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(Supplement_5):S360–S7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kehrmann J, Kaase M, Szabados F, Gatermann SG, Buer J, Rath PM, et al. Vancomycin MIC creep in MRSA blood culture isolates from Germany: a regional problem? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30(5):677–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10096-010-1140-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van Duijkeren E, Greko C, Pringle M, Baptiste KE, Catry B, Jukes H, et al. Pleuromutilins: use in food-producing animals in the European Union, development of resistance and impact on human and animal health. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(8):2022–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dku123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Metcalf BJ, Chochua S, Gertz RE Jr, Li Z, Walker H, Tran T, et al. Using whole genome sequencing to identify resistance determinants and predict antimicrobial resistance phenotypes for year 2015 invasive pneumococcal disease isolates recovered in the United States. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(12):1002.e1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Dunai A, Spohn R, Farkas Z, Lázár V, Györkei Á, Apjok G, et al. Rapid decline of bacterial drug-resistance in an antibiotic-free environment through phenotypic reversion. Elife. 2019;8:e47088. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.7554/eLife.47088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Enne Virve I, Delsol Anne A, Roe John M, Bennett PM. Evidence of antibiotic resistance gene silencing in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(9):3003–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.00137-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kime L, Randall CP, Banda FI, Coll F, Wright J, Richardson J, et al. Transient silencing of antibiotic resistance by mutation represents a significant potential source of unanticipated therapeutic Failure. mBio. 2019;10(5):e01755–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang Z, Zhai Y, Guo Y, Li D, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. Characterization of unexpressed extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes in antibiotic–sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;24(6):799–806. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1089/mdr.2017.0018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. O’Neill CE, Seth-Smith HMB, Van Der Pol B, Harris SR, Thomson NR, Cutcliffe LT, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates identified as tetracycline resistant do not exhibit resistance in vitro: whole-genome sequencing reveals a mutation in porB but no evidence for tetracycline resistance genes. Microbiology. 2013;159(Pt_4):748–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vk D, Srikumar S, Shetty S, van Nguyen S, Karunasagar I, Fanning S. Silent antibiotic resistance genes: a threat to antimicrobial therapy. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;79:20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.11.063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu Y, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Wang S, Chen L, Wu C, et al. Investigation of a multiresistance gene cfr that fails to mediate resistance to phenicols and oxazolidinones in Enterococcus faecalis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(4):892–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dkt459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Li Y, Metcalf BJ, Chochua S, Li Z, Gertz RE Jr, Walker H, et al. Validation of β-lactam minimum inhibitory concentration predictions for pneumococcal isolates with newly encountered penicillin binding protein (PBP) sequences. BMC Genom. 2017;18(1):621. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-017-4017-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Beall B, Chochua S, Gertz RE Jr, Li Y, Li Z, McGee L, et al. A population-based descriptive atlas of invasive pneumococcal strains recovered within the U.S. During 2015-2016. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Varghese J, Chochua S, Tran T, Walker H, Li Z, Snippes Vagnone PM, et al. Multistate population and whole genome sequence-based strain surveillance of invasive pneumococci recovered in the USA during 2017. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(4):512.e1–e10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Metcalf BJ, Chochua S, Gertz RE Jr, Hawkins PA, Ricaldi J, Li Z, et al. Short-read whole genome sequencing for determination of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and capsular serotypes of current invasive Streptococcus agalactiae recovered in the USA. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(8):574.e7–e14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. de Jong A, Thomas V, Simjee S, Moyaert H, El Garch F, Maher K, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs across Europe: The VetPath study. Vet Microbiol. 2014;172(1):202–15. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.04.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Quail MA, Kozarewa I, Smith F, Scally A, Stephens PJ, Durbin R, et al. A large genome center’s improvements to the Illumina sequencing system. Nat Methods. 2008;5(12):1005–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/nmeth.1270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Joshi N, Fass J. Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files. 2011.

  76. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology. 2012;19(5):455–77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Wingett SW, Andrews S. FastQ Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res. 2018;7:1338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Cheng L, Connor TR, Sirén J, Aanensen DM, Corander J. Hierarchical and spatially explicit clustering of DNA sequences with BAPS software. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(5):1224–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/molbev/mst028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.

  82. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3691–3. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Ranwez V, Harispe S, Delsuc F, Douzery EJP. MACSE: multiple alignment of coding sequences accounting for frameshifts and stop codons. PloS one. 2011;6(9):e22594. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0022594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(2):289–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hunt M, Mather AE, Sánchez-Busó L, Page AJ, Parkhill J, Keane JA, et al. ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genom. 2017;3(10):e000131. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1099/mgen.0.000131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Lopez P, Espinosa M, Greenberg B, Lacks S. Sulfonamide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: DNA sequence of the gene encoding dihydropteroate synthase and characterization of the enzyme. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(9):4320–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/jb.169.9.4320-4326.1987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Adrian PV, Klugman KP. Mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of trimethoprim-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(11):2406–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.41.11.2406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Hakenbeck R, Grebe T, Zähner D, Stock JB. β-Lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: penicillin-binding proteins and non-penicillin-binding proteins. Mol Microbiol. 1999;33(4):673–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01521.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkh340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(2):221–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/molbev/msp259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Contreras-Martel C, Dahout-Gonzalez C, Martins Ados S, Kotnik M, Dessen A. PBP active site flexibility as the key mechanism for beta-lactam resistance in pneumococci. J Mol Biol. 2009;387(4):899–909. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.02.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Haenni M, Galofaro L, Ythier M, Giddey M, Majcherczyk P, Moreillon P, et al. Penicillin-binding protein gene alterations in Streptococcus uberis isolates presenting decreased susceptibility to penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(3):1140–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.00915-09.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Piccinelli G, Carlentini G, Gargiulo F, Caruso A, De Francesco MA. Analysis of point mutations in the pbp2x, pbp2b, and pbp1a genes of Streptococcus agalactiae and their relation with a reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(8):1019–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1089/mdr.2017.0013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Haroche J, Allignet J, Buchrieser C, El Solh N. Characterization of a variant of vga (A) conferring resistance to streptogramin A and related compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(9):2271–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.44.9.2271-2275.2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Pikis A, Donkersloot JA, Rodriguez WJ, Keith JM. A conservative amino acid mutation in the chromosome-encoded dihydrofolate reductase confers trimethoprim resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(3):700–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/515371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bergmann R, van der Linden M, Chhatwal GS, Nitsche-Schmitz DP. Factors that cause trimethoprim resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):2281–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.02282-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Athey TBT, Teatero S, Lacouture S, Takamatsu D, Gottschalk M, Fittipaldi N. Determining Streptococcus suis serotype from short-read whole-genome sequencing data. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2013.

  99. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Heisterkamp S, Van Willigen B, et al. Package ‘nlme’. 2019.

  100. Streptococcus suis Genome sequencing and assembly. NCBI BioProject accession PRJNA628943. 2020. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/bioproject/?term=PRJNA628943.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Abiyad Baig, Andrew Balmer and Olivier Restif for helpful discussion on antimicrobial resistance in S. suis. In addition, we wish to acknowledge Chris Teale and three anonymous reviewers for improvements to the manuscript.

Funding

This work was primarily supported by a Challenge grant from the Royal Society (reference: CH160114) and an Isaac Newton Trust Research Grant (reference: 17.24(u)). In addition, LAW, ELM and GGRM were supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (109385/Z/15/Z). We also acknowledge a BBSRC grant to AWT (BBSRC grant BB/L003902/1), a LoLa grant to DJM and AWT (BB/G019274/1) and a China MoST grant to RZ (2013DFG32360) for sample collections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Nazreen F. Hadjirin, Gemma G. R. Murray, Thomas M. Wileman, Juan Hernandez-Garcia, Julian Parkhill, A. W. ( Dan) Tucker & Lucy A. Weinert

  2. Microbial Ecology and Evolution Laboratory, Haverford College, Haverford, USA

    Eric L. Miller

  3. Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Phung L. K. Yen, Ho D. Phuc & Ngo Thi Hoa

  4. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), London, UK

    Susanna M. Williamson

  5. Chancellery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Duncan J. Maskell

  6. College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    Rui Zhou

  7. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada

    Nahuel Fittipaldi & Marcelo Gottschalk

  8. Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    John J. Welch

Authors
  1. Nazreen F. Hadjirin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric L. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gemma G. R. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Phung L. K. Yen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ho D. Phuc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas M. Wileman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Juan Hernandez-Garcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Susanna M. Williamson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Julian Parkhill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Duncan J. Maskell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Rui Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nahuel Fittipaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Marcelo Gottschalk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. A. W. ( Dan) Tucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ngo Thi Hoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. John J. Welch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Lucy A. Weinert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LAW and NTH conceived the study. AWT, SMW, RZ, MG, NF, JHG, TMW, JP and DJM contributed isolates. NFH, ELM, PLKY, HDP and NTH collected new data. NFH, ELM, GGRM, JJW and LAW analysed data. JJW produced all figures. LAW, NFH and JJW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazreen F. Hadjirin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Bacterial isolates were collected from pigs by non-invasive sampling as part of wider preventive health programmes intended to control endemic diseases in the UK and Canada and therefore did not require ethical clearance. The collection of isolates from humans and animals in Vietnam was approved by the ethical committee of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, HCMC (CS/NĐ/09/13) and the Sub Department of Animal Health of Ho Chi Minh City (1242/SNN-NN).

Consent for publication

All authors and funders have given their consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. The 678 isolates in our collection with meta data, MIC values and candidate determinant presence/absence.

Additional file 2: Figures S1-S13

and Table S2. Fig S1 – Phylogenetic tree. Fig S2 – MICs in Canada & the UK. Fig S3 - The effects of candidate determinants on MIC for beta-lactams Fig S4 - The effects of candidate determinants on MIC for MLSB. Fig S5 - The effects of candidate alleles on MIC for tetracyclines. Fig S6 - The effects of candidate alleles on MIC for fluoroquinolone. Fig S7 - The effects of candidate alleles on MIC for the aminoglycoside, spectinomycin. Fig S8 - The effects of candidate alleles on MIC for the pleuromutilin, tiamulin. Fig S9 - The effects of candidate alleles on MIC for trimethoprim (TMP). Fig S10 - Variation in the presence of candidate AMR determinants explains consistent differences between genetic clusters. Fig S11 - Methods of using candidate determinants to predict MIC. Fig S12 - Allelic variation in ermB and unidentified sources of epistasis. Fig S13 -High levels of ‘nestedness’ suggest that resistance determinants to beta-lactams are acquired in a particular order. Table S2 - Binomial tests showing that novel AMR variants are independently associated with MIC in different genetic clusters.

Additional file 3: Table S3

-The 401 additional isolates used to estimate population structure with their genetic BAPs cluster and their data availability.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hadjirin, N.F., Miller, E.L., Murray, G.G.R. et al. Large-scale genomic analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. BMC Biol 19, 191 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12915-021-01094-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12915-021-01094-1

Keywords

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us