- Open Access
Plastid evolution: gene transfer and the maintenance of 'stolen' organelles
© Kim and Archibald; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 17 May 2010
Accepted: 03 June 2010
Published: 10 June 2010
Many heterotrophic organisms sequester plastids from prey algae and temporarily utilize their photosynthetic capacity. A recent article in BMC Genomics reveals that the dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata has acquired photosynthesis-related genes by horizontal gene transfer, which might explain its ability to retain 'stolen' plastids for extended periods of time.
See research article http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2164/11/366
The evolution of plastids - the light-gathering organelles of eukaryotic algae and plants - was a pivotal event in eukaryotic evolution. A number of eukaryotic lineages have acquired photosynthesis directly from cyanobacteria (that is, primary endosymbiosis) or indirectly via secondary or even tertiary endosymbiotic events involving eukaryotes in the role of both host and endosymbiont . The dinoflagellates, a phylum of unicellular eukaryotes containing both photosynthetic and heterotrophic members, are the undisputed champions of plastid acquisition, having obtained plastids from phylogenetically diverse algal groups. Using the latest transcriptome sequencing technologies, Wisecaver and Hackett , in a paper recently published in BMC Genomics, provide fascinating insight into the genetics and cell biology of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata, an organism whose 'stolen' plastids appear to be serviced by nucleus-encoded proteins of diverse evolutionary origins.
Acquired phototrophy in dinoflagellates
Retention time of transient plastids in dinoflagellates under laboratory conditions
Source of transient plastids
Around 2 months
At least 40 days
Chroomonas sp. (cryptophyte)
At least 10 days
Rhodomonas salina (cryptophyte)
Rhodomonas sp. (cryptophyte)
At least 9 days2
Phaeocystis antarctica (haptophyte)
Plastids in Dinophysis
The dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis is broadly distributed in the ocean and currently includes over 100 species, some of which pose major economic and health concerns as agents of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. Dinophysis is well known for its ability to sequester and utilize functional plastids of cryptophyte and, less commonly, haptophyte origins . Curiously, strains of Dinophysis appear incapable of harvesting plastids directly from the algal cells; they acquire them indirectly by engulfing the ciliate Myrionecta rubra, a heterotroph that itself feeds on cryptophytes belonging to the Teleaulax/Geminigera clade . In M. rubra, the cryptophyte-derived plastids exist as chloroplast (plastid)-mitochondrial complexes (CMCs), and one or more cryptophyte nuclei are retained separately from the CMCs in the ciliate host cytoplasm . In contrast, cryptophyte-derived plastids of Dinophysis are bounded by two membranes and are devoid of nucleomorphs and mitochondria .
Whether or not the plastids of Dinophysis are permanent or transient has been the subject of much debate. Recent molecular data and culture experiments support the idea that Dinophysis plastids are most likely to be transient and need to be periodically 'replaced' by re-uptake of photosynthetic M. rubra [8, 10]. However, differences in the ultrastructure of Dinophysis plastids and those of free-living cryptophyte cells suggest to some researchers that Dinophysis consumes M. rubra not to replace its plastids, but rather to obtain growth factors and other essential compounds .
In the case of the dinoflagellates D. caudata and D. fortii, the acquired cryptophyte plastids remain functional for well over a month in the absence of the cryptophyte nucleomorph and nucleus [8, 11]. This is remarkable given that present-day plastids possess at most around 200 protein-coding genes, a fraction of the coding capacity of their cyanobacterial progenitors, and are dependent on the import of hundreds of nucleus-encoded proteins. Wisecaver and Hackett  surveyed the expressed gene set of D. acuminata in an effort to determine the extent to which its nuclear genome contains cryptophyte-derived genes for plastid-targeted proteins that could aid in the long-term stability of stolen plastids. In doing so, the authors took advantage of the 22-bp trans-spliced leader (SL) sequence present on mature dinoflagellate mRNAs, but not on those of ciliates or cryptophytes. D. acuminata poly(A)-primed cDNA was amplified using a 5' SL primer and sequenced using ultra-high-throughput 454 pyrosequencing. To control for the possibility of contamination, the transcriptomes of the ciliate M. rubra and the cryptophyte Geminigera cryophila, the organisms from which D. acuminata acquires its plastid, were also surveyed. The results are significant for two main reasons.
First, from a set of approximately 6,000 unique gene clusters, Wisecaver and Hackett  identified only five dinoflagellate nuclear genes that were strong candidates for being plastid-related - psbU, petF, and psbM and genes for the light-harvesting protein LI818 and the triose-phosphate transporter TPT. As predicted, the protein products of these five genes possess putative transit peptides: that is, amino-terminal leader sequences that are required to translocate host-synthesized proteins across the two inner plastid membranes in other algae . D. acuminata thus appears to possess significantly fewer plastid-related genes in its nucleus than do dinoflagellates with permanent plastids, suggesting that transfer of additional genes for plastid-targeted proteins must occur if the stolen plastids are to be fully integrated into the host dinoflagellate. Second, sequence analyses reveal that only one of the plastid-related genes identified in D. acuminata (psbM) actually comes from the same source as its stolen plastid - that is, cryptophyte algae. The remaining four genes appear to have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer from other sources, including haptophytes and fucoxanthin-containing dinoflagellates .
The results of Wisecaver and Hackett  are particularly interesting when contrasted with the evolution of kleptoplastidy in the sea slug Elysia chlorotica, an organism that harvests plastids from the stramenopile alga Vaucheria litorea . The transient plastids of E. chlorotica remain remarkably stable for up to 10 months in the absence of the algal nucleus. Recent studies have uncovered a number of genes for putative plastid-targeted proteins in the sea-slug nucleus, such as psbO (for photosystem II) and fcp (for light-harvesting complexes) . These sea-slug genes have uniformly high sequence identities to homologs in V. litorea, suggesting that the genes were transferred relatively recently from the algal nucleus. This is in stark contrast to the situation in D. acuminata, whose putative plastid-targeted proteins have been acquired from multiple algal sources. This difference is perhaps explained by the trophic strategy of D. acuminata, which, in contrast to E. chlorotica, consumes a variety of prey, including many different photosynthetic algae, while performing acquired phototrophy. Exactly when D. acuminata acquired these 'foreign' genes is unclear. Some or all heterotrophic dinoflagellates are thought to be ancestrally photosynthetic , and so at least some of them might be holdovers from a time when Dinophysis species harbored more conventional plastids.
The advent of ultra-high-throughput sequencing has made it possible to obtain massive sequence datasets from experimentally challenging organisms - and even collections of intimately associated organisms - on a scale unimaginable even a few years ago. The results of Wisecaver and Hackett  represent a landmark in this regard, providing an important launch point for future dissection of the molecular and biochemical processes involved in dinoflagellate kleptoplastidy. Such experimentation will include definitive proof that the gene products in question are indeed targeted to the plastids in the context of D. acuminata cells, and even deeper transcriptome sequencing to further assess the degree of plastid proteome mosaicism in these intriguing organisms.
We thank LW Wilcox, LE Graham, and JD Hackett for comments on an earlier version of this article.
- Sanchez-Puerta MV, Delwiche CF: A hypothesis for plastid evolution in chromalveolates. J Phycol. 2008, 44: 1097-1107. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00559.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wisecaver JH, Hackett JD: Transcriptome analysis reveals nuclear-encoded proteins for the maintenance of temporary plastids in the dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 366-10.1186/1471-2164-11-366.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hackett JD, Anderson DM, Erdner DL, Bhattacharya D: Dinoflagellates: a remarkable evolutionary experiment. Am J Bot. 2004, 91: 1523-1534. 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1523.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson MD: The acquisition of phototrophy: adaptive strategies of hosting endosymbionts and organelles. Photosynth Res. 2010Google Scholar
- Fields SD, Rhodes RG: Ingestion and retention of Chroomonas spp. (Cryptophyceae) by Gymnodinium acidotum (Dinophyceae). J Phycol. 1991, 27: 525-529. 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1991.00525.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox LW, Wedemayer GJ: Dinoflagellate with blue-green chloroplasts derived from an endosymbiotic eukaryote. Science. 1985, 227: 192-194. 10.1126/science.227.4683.192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riisgaard K, Hansen PJ: Role of food uptake for photosynthesis, growth and survival of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009, 381: 51-62. 10.3354/meps07953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park MG, Park JS, Kim M, Yih W: Plastid dynamics during survival of Dinophysis caudata without its ciliate prey. J Phycol. 2008, 44: 1154-1163. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00579.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skovgaard A: Role of chloroplast retention in a marine dinoflagellate. Aquat Microb Ecol. 1998, 15: 293-301. 10.3354/ame015293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takishita K, Koike K, Maruyama T, Ogata T: Molecular evidence for plastid robbery (kleptoplastidy) in Dinophysis, a dinoflagellate causing diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. Protist. 2002, 153: 293-302. 10.1078/1434-4610-00106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagai S, Nitshitani G, Tomaru Y, Sakiyama S, Kamiyama T: Predation by the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis fortii on the ciliate Myrionecta rubra and observation of sequestration of ciliate chloroplasts. J Phycol. 2008, 44: 909-922. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00544.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rumpho ME, Worful JM, Lee J, Kannan K, Tyler MS, Bhattacharya D, Moustafa A, Manhart JR: Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 17867-17871. 10.1073/pnas.0804968105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewitus AJ, Glasgow HB, Burkholder JM: Kleptoplastidy in the toxic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida (Dinophyceae). J Phycol. 1999, 35: 303-312. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520303.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gast RJ, Moran DM, Dennett MR, Caron DA: Kleptoplasty in an Antarctic dinoflagellate: caught in evolutionary transition?. Environ Microbiol. 2007, 9: 39-45. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01109.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.